TDP 40: Uniswap v3 Liquidity Deployment

Simple Summary

It is proposed to deploy a protocol-owned MTA/WETH position on Uniswap v3, as the current LaaS incentive from Ondo Finance is coming to an end and has proven to be less effective than anticipated.

It is suggested to deploy in a range that allows us to enter the position with 100% MTA, and have the pair slowly convert to ETH as MTA appreciates in value over time.


Since we began thinking more about Protocol Controlled Value (PCV), we tried several different options, including Ondo Finance’s LaaS, as well as Gamma Strategies actively managed Uniswap v3 position.

We came to the conclusion that Ondo Finance’s offer is very heavily dependent on a stable performance of MTA, while the Gamma Strategies offer is only slowly receiving MTA via the dial from our Emissions Controller.

Previously, we also directly competed with Gamma Strategies due to our own MTA/DAI pairing and arrived at the conclusion that deploying our own MTA/WETH pair on Uniswap v3 makes sense. This move will also stop the competing aspect of these pairs, and instead have them work together for a deeper liquidity offering.

As Gamma offers relatively tight ranges, we would deploy this new pair with a larger range to ensure constant liquidity, while also avoiding selling off any more MTA below a certain threshold.

Based on these findings by dimsome, an entry in this position at the upper range of around 7381 MTA per ETH is proposed (which can and will be re-adjusted just before entering the position based on the MTA/WETH price at the time of deployment to allow for single-sided entry) and a lower range set to 1130 with a fee of 1%.

The Asset Management subDAO will deploy the position using 1,000,000 MTA funded from the TreasuryDAO and will have the liberty to re-adjust the range once per quarter if this economically sensible.


In order to keep our liquidity in-house and not spend incentives to get a third party to deploy on our behalf, we have previously consulted with different protocols to do this on our behalf, with varying success.

Given the track record, we believe it is most wholesome for the mStable project to once again deploy our own liquidity on Uniswap v3 and consolidate the current effort with Gamma Strategies one very strong and liquid pair, with easy entry and exit opportunities across the DeFi ecosystem.

The manual process involved combined with the unavoidable realization of some impermanent loss from Ondo Finance made us understand that their offer is currently too risky, given the economic and geopolitical sentiment we have today.

Instead, we will solve this issue once and for all with a bullish range deployment of MTA on Uniswap v3, which also will give the treasury a lot of upside exposure to ETH, and will eventually arrive at the position owning only ETH, which can then be further utilized in the space as we deploy an even more bullish fresh MTA position on Uniswap v3, and at which stage the Gamma position should hold a much healthier portion of MTA than is currently the case.


1.) Send 1,000,000 MTA from the TreasuryDAO to the Asset Management subDAO

2.) Determine the current upper range at the time of deployment and use that range and a low range of 1130 MTA/ETH

3.) Deploy the position at slightly above (+0.1%) the determined upper range to allow for single-sided entry

4.) Re-adjust the range once per quarter if deemed necessary and economically viable

Next Steps

Pending no significant changes to its content, this proposal will be taken to a Snapshot vote on Monday, the 25th of April 2022 .

Voting will be open for a 5 days window to give adequate time for a concurrent discussion. Governors can change their vote at any time should the discussion sway their decision. We look forward to hearing what MTA token holders have to say and seeing how they cast their votes.

Since this position is in the Asset Management subDAO, in conjunction with the pre-approval, we would be able to adjust this position every once in a while? I would love to monitor it and suggest changes if we deem them worthy, especially when gas is low.

Here is the proposed range for reference:

1 Like

I don’t see a problem with that if there’s a real benefit for doing so more than once per quarter, and as long as the entire position is worth less than 500k :sweat_smile:

Do you think we need to alter the 4th spec point because of this? Since we do not yet know the outcome of that discretionary TDP to come, I’d be cautious changing this in a way that would predict future outcomes of yet unwritten TDPs :thinking:

No, I think the way it is, is fine. We can just see if we need to adjust and I could post my recommendations.

1 Like

I like it ser, big brain energy all over this position! :grin: